Pengaruh Perceived Of Benefit Terhadap Niat Untuk Menggunakan Layanan Dompet Digital Di Kalangan Milenial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v15i2.67Keywords:
Dompet Digital, Perceived Benefit, Intention To use, Behaviour useAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) Untuk menjelaskan bagaimana pengaruh antara Perceived Benefit terhadap Intention to use dompet digital. (2) Untuk menjelaskan bagaimana pengaruh antara Intention to used terhadap behaviour use dompet digital. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian penjelasan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Variabel penelitian ini meliputi Perceived Benefit, Intention to use dan behaviour use . Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah kaum Milenial dengan rentang umur 17-37 tahun dan pernah menggunakan dompet digital. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 116 orang responden yang diambil dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dan metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survei dan kuesioner. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dan dengan instrumen angket dan pengukuran menggunakan skala semantic deferensial. Pendekatan analisis jalur yang diolah dengan persamaan model struktural menggunakan Lisrel 8.7. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perceived benefit berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Intention to use dompet digital dan Behaviour use. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa faktor manfaat dalam menggunakan dompet digital pada kaum milenial tetap menjadi pertimbangan keputusan.
Downloads
References
A. Z. Susilo, M. Iksan Prabowo, A.Taman, A. Pustikaningsih, and A. Samlawi, “A comparative study of factors affecting user acceptance of go-pay and OVo as a feature of Fintech application,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 876¬884, 2019, doi:
1016/j.procs.2019.11.195.
Z. Bezhovski, “The Future of the Mobile Payment as Electronic Payment System,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag., 2016.
S. Megadewandanu, Suyoto, and Pranowo, “Exploring mobile wallet adoption in Indonesia using UTAUT2: An approach from
consumer perspective,” Proc. - 2016 2nd Int. Conf. Sci. Technol. ICST 2016, pp. 11-16, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICSTC.2016.7877340.
A. Demuth, Perception Theories, no. 4. 2012.
H.-S. Ryu, “Understanding Benefit and Risk Framework of Fintech Adoption: Comparison of Early Adopters and Late Adopters,” Proc. 51st Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., pp. 3864-3873, 2018, doi: 10.24251/hicss.2018.486.
E. Taylor, “Mobile payment technologies in retail: a review of potential benefits and risks,” Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. , vol. 44, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-05- 2015-0065.
D. D. Fitri Anggraini Gunawan, “Analisis Pengaruh Iklan Televisi Dan Endorser Terhadap Purchase Intention Pond’S Men Dengan Brand Awareness Sebagai Variabel Intervening,” J. Manaj. Pemasar. Petra, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1 -14, 2014, doi: 10.7498/aps.62.170507.
A. Ploder and A. Eder, “SemanticDifferential,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second
Edition, 2015.
I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling andPurposive Sampling,” Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., 2016, doi: 10.11648/j .ajtas.20160501.11.
Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian,” Metod. Penelit., 2015.
J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J.Babin, and R. E. Anderson, “Multivariate Data Analysis,” Vectors. 2010, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019.
T. Cleff, Exploratory Data Analysis in Business and Economics. 2014.
M. D. Williams, G. H. Davies, S. Roderick, and M. Clement, “Risk, trust, and compatibility as antecedents of mobile payment adoption,” AMCIS 2017 - Am. Conf. Inf. Syst. A Tradit. Innov., vol. 2017-Augus, no. 1989, pp. 1¬10, 2017.
J. Sarwono, “Pengertian Dasar Structural Equation Modeling ( Sem ),” J. Ilm. Manaj. Bisnis, pp. 173-182, 2010.
N. Tabri and C. M. Elliott, “Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling,” Can. Grad. J. Sociol. Criminol., 2012, doi: 10.15353/cgjsc-
rcessc.v1i1.25.
D. F. Haynes and N. Cahn, “25- 131-1-PB.pdf,” vol. 1, pp. 56-60, 2012.
C. Lleras, “Path Analysis,” Encycl.Soc. Meas., vol. 3, pp. 25-30, 2004, doi: 10.1016/B0-12-369398- 5/00483-7.
Z. Awang, “Validating the Measurement Model: Cfa,” Struct. Equ. Model. using amos Graf. , 2014.
Z. Shao, L. Zhang, X. Li, and Y.Guo, “Antecedents of trust and continuance intention in mobile payment platforms: The
moderating effect of gender,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. , vol. 33, p. 100823, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.100823.
D. Mcknight, V. Choudhury, andC. (“Chuck”) Kacmar, “The Impact of Initial Consumer Trust on Intentions to Transact with a Web Site: A Trust Building Model,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 11, pp. 297-323, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3.
A. F. Agudo-Peregrina, A.Hernandez-Garcia, and F. J. Pascual-Miguel, “Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 34, pp. 301-314, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035.
